May 8, 2021


every news you want

Police chief says US intelligence failed to warn of scale of riot on Capitol Hill | Donald Trump News

3 min read

The acting Capitol Police chief will testify before a House committee as Congress continues to investigate the violence.

Police at the United States Capitol were aware of the possibility of violence from armed extremists when the Capitol was attacked by supporters of former President Donald Trump, but intelligence did not indicate the extent possible of the event and officers were overwhelmed by “insurgents”, the acting police. The Chief must testify at a hearing in the House.

Information collected before January 6 aggression on Capitol Hill suggested the rally would have the participation of “armed militiamen, white supremacists and other extremist groups,” Yogananda Pittman said in prepared testimony to be delivered to the House appropriations committee on Thursday.

Pittman was the department’s deputy police chief of protection and intelligence operations and was responsible for its Interagency Intelligence and Coordination Division (IICD) on the day of the riot, which came after weeks Trump claimed that the election had been “stolen” and moments after the former president staged a rally urging his supporters to “fight” the results.

The IICD said in an assessment released Jan. 3 that Trump supporters saw Jan. 6 as the last opportunity to overturn the presidential election results and that their sense of hopelessness and disappointment “could lead to more great incentive to become violent ”.

“While the Department stood ready to neutralize and remove individuals or groups engaging in civil disobedience or violence among protesters, it was quickly overwhelmed by the thousands of insurgents (many of whom are armed) who immediately and without provocation began to attack the officers, bypassing physical barriers refusing to comply with legal orders, ”added Pittman.

“The Department’s preparations were based on information gathered from its law enforcement partners like the FBI and other members of the intelligence community, none of which indicated a massive insurgency of this magnitude. would perform on the US Capitol on January 6, ”she said. .

Pittman also says the department faced “internal challenges” in responding to the riot. Officers did not properly lock down the Capitol complex, even after an order was given over the radio to do so. She also says the officers did not understand when they were allowed to use lethal force and that the less than lethal weapons the officers had were not as effective as expected.

The attack on Capitol Hill delayed certification of Biden’s victory by several hours, as lawmakers were forced to flee the angry mob that overwhelmed the security forces. Five people died in the violence.

More than 200 people have been charged to date for their role in the riot, including some with links to extreme right-wing fringe groups such as the Oath Keepers and Proud boys.

Congressional inquiries

Pittman’s testimony comes to Congress keep probing the violence of January 6 and the security failures that led to it.

Supporters of U.S. President Donald Trump broke security and entered Capitol Hill as Congress debated certification of the vote for the 2020 presidential election [File: Saul Loeb|/AFP]

Investigations come in Trump’s wake acquittal February 14 in a Senate trial after being indicted for “incitement to insurgency” for his role.

Lawmakers also announced that they would create an independent 9/11 commission to investigate the riot.

An FBI warning that a protest by Trump supporters could turn violent reached Capitol Police the day before the attack, but senior officials responsible for securing Congress that day did not see it. they told lawmakers on Tuesday.

Pittman’s predecessor, Steven Sund, said that while Capitol Police had prepared for “the possibility of violence” and armed protesters, they had not trained for “the possibility of a coordinated attack style. military involving thousands of people against the Capitol ”.

Sund also said he requested the deployment of National Guard troops two days before Jan.6, but former House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving told him “he was concerned” the perspective “of the presence of the National Guard”.

Irving Tuesday refuse that optics played a role in the decision not to preemptively deploy National Guard troops, claiming instead that “the intelligence did not warrant it.”

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *